JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 30, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Antonio Maria Rodriguez Acosta

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para promover cumplimiento de sus sentencias y dar trámite a incidente de desacato
Tramite De Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Solicitud simultánea o sucesiva por beneficiario
Accion De Tutela Contra Juzgado Unico Civil Municipal Y Banco Agrario
  • Rechazar solicitud de cumplimiento de sentencia T-640/05
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-640/05.

El accionante le informó a la Corporación que en repetidas ocasiones ha solicitado tanto al juzgado que tuvo conocimiento del proceso ejecutivo y sobre quien recaía la orden directa de la Corte Constitucional, como al juez de primera instancia en tutela, el cumplimiento de la providencia de la referencia, sin que haya obtenido una respuesta positiva, por lo que pide que sea la Sala quien asuma el cumplimiento de su propia providencia.

Luego de analizar la petición, la Sala Cuarta de Revisión decidió RECHAZARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia T-640 de 2005, presentada por Antonio Maria Rodriguez Acosta.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.